errors mine alone chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk Statistician DAMTP Cambridge, residing Bethesda, MD: AT CU.com please find my attempt to celebrate my greatest personal privilege: to visit women empowered Bangladesh 15 times from 2007 during last 13 years of life of Fazle Abed. From 2012 we discussed AbedMOOC and 2015 onwards at his 80th birthday AbedAI. Back in 2001, Abed 65th birthday hosted by Steve Jobs in Silicon Valley changed both of these human genii's life work. Even today I dont spend time exploring America AI with any engineers or practitioners of health or education, food or safety or finance, who dont want to know what they (we humans all) owe to Steve J. By 2003 Jobs' pixar, Nvidia, and Hopkins radiologists started replacing coding of binary by coding of pixels - welcome to AI century 2]
2026:Christmas comes early to Ai Youth - Nvidia GTC-DC Nov 30 to Dec 2
Pretraining proposal Gemini (model UYKB: Layer 6 AI+Media)
7-Layer Intelligence Discourse GTC D.C. adds 2 layers to Jensen 5-layer AI Cake!
Because the D.C. summit sits in the heart of the nation’s capital at the Ronald Reagan Building, Jensen Huang’s team is prepping a narrative explicitly tailored to reindustrialization, national security, and state-backed compute. [1, 2]
  • Layer 1 (Nature's Energy) & Layer 2 (Machine Brainpower): The central conversation focuses on the Vertically Integrated Sovereign AI Factory. Nvidia will address the West's current power grid constraints, pushing for multi-gigawatt computing nodes tied directly to protected modular nuclear baseloads or sovereign energy fields to fuel the upcoming Vera Rubin chip architecture deployment. [1]
  • Layer 3 (Sovereign Data Infrastructure): This is the crown jewel of the D.C. agenda. Nvidia is moving rapidly away from selling chips solely to hyper-scalers (like Microsoft or Amazon) to marketing Layer 3 "Sovereign AI" packages directly to federal agencies, the Department of Defense, and international allies. The talk centers on how nations can utilize Nvidia hardware to train national models on state-owned text, military telemetry, and geographic data without leaking information to corporate data monopolies. [1]
  • Layer 5 (Civic Applications) & Layer 7 (The Deterministic Truth Layer): The D.C. floor will showcase heavy-industry integrations. A major thread is how federal systems can use AI Digital Twins and Quantum-resistant encryption to safeguard public infrastructure against adversarial cyber warfare. By pairing generative logic with hardcoded physics modeling, Nvidia wants to show the Pentagon that its models can function as an un-hallucinated layer of deterministic truth. [1, 2, 3]
The Direct Line: Berlin Crisis (October) to Washington D.C. (December)
The D.C. summit will act as the direct remedy and strategic response to the systemic frictions exposed weeks prior at the Berlin GTC. The two events are deeply intertwined across the 7 layers: [1]
[ GTC BERLIN • OCTOBER 2026 ]                     [ GTC WASHINGTON D.C. • DEC 2026 ]
       "The Crisis Echo"                                 "The Sovereign Fix"

               |                                                  |
• Severe European Layer 1 energy shortages.      • Unveiling federal multi-gigawatt grids.
• Layer 3 splintering (EU Data Act friction).    • Hardcoded Layer 3 Allied AI networks.
• Debate over relying on U.S. cloud giants.     • Bypassing public clouds via local edge nodes.
  1. The Energy Realignment (Layer 1): In Berlin, Jensen Huang will confront the grim reality of Europe’s highly fragmented, expensive, and legally constrained green grids. The "Berlin Crisis" refers to the continent's inability to spin up gigawatt-scale data factories fast enough to match the U.S. or China. When Huang lands in D.C., he will use the European shortfall to pressure Congress to fast-track defense-grade energy allocations for American compute clusters. [1, 2]
  2. The Sovereignty Conflict (Layer 3 & 4): Berlin will highlight severe regulatory friction over European data sovereignty and the EU Data Act. European public broadcasters and governments are terrified of routing their localized data through American corporate monopolies. Washington GTC will capitalize on this by formalizing a blueprint for "Allied AI" networks—demonstrating how Europe and the U.S. can exchange open-weight models securely across borders while maintaining local, sovereign hardware boundaries. [1]
  3. The Physical AI Transition (Layer 5): While Berlin will focus heavily on Germany’s specialized precision engineering and factory-floor robotics, the D.C. summit will elevate those industrial applications to a geopolitical scale. The discussions in Washington will center on deploying those exact autonomous robotics playbooks into automated naval shipyards, military logistics pipelines, and aerospace satellite defense systems. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Would you like to drill down into the specific Department of Defense T4NG contract vehicles Nvidia partners are mobilizing for the D.C. event, or examine the open-weight software microservices (NIMs) being deployed to appease European sovereignty regulations in Berlin? [1, 2, 3]



Before AI lifted off in late 2000s 3 underacknowlefgen Happenings: 1 steve jobs hosted Fazle Abed's 65 th birthday party silicon valley 2001; .jensen hunag and steve jobs went from coding binary to cosinf pixels; Fazle abed clarified that paulo freire culture celebrated poorest asian womens ebd poverty networking miracle -- largest NGO, providing education, health services, microcredit and livelihood creation programmes for a significant part of the population of Bangladesh. What lies behind this huge success, Caroline Hartnell asked Fazle Abed, founder of BRAC and still very much at the helm. Questioning everything they do and being prepared to tackle whatever is needed to make their programmes successful are certainly part of the secret behind the success of this extraordinarily entrepreneurial organization. The secret of success? Asked what lies behind BRAC’s phenomenal success, the first thing Fazle Abed mentions is determination: ‘We were determined to bring about changes in the lives of poor people.’ The second thing is thinking in national terms: ‘We always had a national goal; we never thought in terms of working in a small area. We thought, all right, if we work with the poorest people in this community, who’s going to work with the poorest people in that other community? So we felt that whatever we do, we should try and replicate it throughout the nation if we can.’ The third thing he mentions is inspiration. ‘We always thought nationally, worked locally, and looked for inspiration globally. We were inspired by Paolo Freire’s work on the pedagogy of the oppressed, which he came out with in 1972. It was wonderful to have a thinker who was thinking about poor people and how they can become actors in history and not just passive recipients of other people’s aid. He made us realize that poor people are human beings and can do things for themselves, and it’s our duty to empower them so they can analyse their own situation, see how exploitation works in society, and see what they need to do to escape these exploitative processes.’ Finally, he says, ‘one needs to have not only ambition but also the ability to do the work. The organization must be competent to take on national tasks. That confidence we got from the campaign for oral rehydration, to cut down diarrhoeal mortality, in the 1980s. That involved going to every household in rural Bangladesh, 13 million households, and it took ten years to do it. Then we became a little more ambitious. We thought that if we can go to every household, then we can cover the whole country with everything we do.
..
NB any errors below are mine alone chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk but mathematically we are in a time when order of magnitude ignorance can sink any nation however big. Pretrain to question everything as earth's data is reality's judge
Its time to stop blaming 2/3 of humans who are Asian for their consciously open minds and love of education.

Sunday, May 30, 2021

xi x2 x3 x4 x5 x6

 abed mooc's 6 missing networks -back from sustainability 2030

while a lot of abed alumni data has gone into cataloguing 6 collab networks for each of the 5 deepest goals


we are still working on 6 goals that can integrate all 17 sdg compasses

probably x1 = purposes of markets valuing younger half of world as the first sg generation - eg even markets like sports, fashions, music largely co-created by youth are nowhere near sustainability's true purpose as every force for fake media shows - perhaps the enduring lesson of how japan has been bullied into olympics timing will be that the youth who lead each sport take back that sports administration - www.economistsports.net - it will be particularly interesting to see which champions want a second life representing their races sdgs

x2 we would like to see womens workd develop green league tables of nations- there should not be just one table- indeed ai needs to keep questioning- are the richest playing their far share? have we actually got say top 10 crises from arctic circle melting dwn, from fish no longer inhabiting oceans to infrastucures designed so community scaled enterprises thrive- there are obviously energy and chemical sectors whose purpose define whether we will go carbon zero in time; there are other sectors eg agriculture, water distribution, fashions that use natural resources unsustainably, then there are some virtual resources that may themselves use little resources but which miseducate of mis-app massively non-sustainable behaviors; you can see that finding a name for x2 isnt simple but itcan be double-checked- where historically have male macroeconomists devalued work like bringing up children or serving elders because they have done this through love and not monetisation 

x3 every global profession needs to come out with greatest exponential risk it has externalised and been asked to do this by its biggest cliets; for example goodwill represents up to 90% of organisations most advanced in ir1 to ir4 but there are no transparent metrics - even the type of measure -exponential isread of number is not yet transparent

x4 the very poorest communities of different types - or for each other sdg the most disadvantaged communities facing that goals most extreme challenges are where we need data and mediation to be intehrated- otherwise those who need sustainability most wont get it and will be extinguished first; somehow those most deeply embedded in communities - the mother theresas or the st francis need to be twinned with tech wizards - this hasnt happened the way venture capital in silicon valley spun round unicorns instead of including any hunicorns

x5 we need blenind of infrastructure everywhere real and virtual so every community is a great (at least sustainable) place to be born into- one example discussed at davos agenda jan 021 and promised by both unicek and un @aiforgood geneva; gps tech can help us map where every school is; we can map schools from zeo to 100% digital access; by making sure this data is on everyone screnpage or is valued as a mpbile app; we can make sure eey year narrows the digital divide- in parallel every teacher needs to be trained in imagining what each grade can leap forward in doing once linkedin; in most nations you hace to pass a test to drive a car; 21st c teaching needs a quiz which enables a community's teacher to behavorally understand whay youth will need most mentoring in adapting to the hi tech hi touch age - see education commission asia for more

x6 what will be most different about 2020s is more and more systems once governed by humans will become autonomus- this aspect of humanising ai sustainably is nt widely discussed - what this means is every community needs to twn with thoses who do understand this - eg staford has some great  practice networks; the association www.futureoflife.org offers a staring point- do your region have a member of life; if so how do your communities mediate with the member?

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)