20th century intelligence - ending poverty of half world without electricity -although Keynes 1936 (last capter general theiry money inetrest emplymen) asked Economists to take hipocrati oath as the profession that ended extreme poverty, most economists did the opposite. Whats not understandable is how educatirs failed to catalogue the lessons of the handful who bottom-up empowered vilages to collaboratively end poverty. There are mainly 2 inteligences to understand- Borlaug on food; fazle abed on everything that raised life expectancy in tropical viage asia from low 40s to 60s (about 7 below norm of living with electricity and telecomes). Between 1972 and 2001, Abed's lessons catalogued in this mooc had largelu built the nation of Bangladesh and been replicated with help of Unicef's James Grant acroo most tropical asian areas. What's exciting is the valley's mr ad mrs steve jobs invted Fazle Abed to share inteligences 2001 at his 65th birthday party. The Jobs and frineds promised to integrate abed's inteligence into neighborhod university stanfrd which in any event wanted Jobs next great leap the iphone. The Valley told abed to start a university so that women graduates from poor and rich nations could blend inteligence as Abed's bottom of the pyramid vilage began their journey of leapfrog modles now that gridd infarstructures were ni longer needed for sdiar and mobile. Abed could also help redesign the millennium goals which were being greenwashed into a shared worldwide system coding frame by 2016. There re at Abed's 80th birtday party , the easy bitwas checking this mooc was uptodate. The hard bit - what did Abed mean by his wish to headhunt a taiwanese american to head the university's 3rd decade starting 2020?

Sunday, May 30, 2021

xi x2 x3 x4 x5 x6

 abed mooc's 6 missing networks -back from sustainability 2030

while a lot of abed alumni data has gone into cataloguing 6 collab networks for each of the 5 deepest goals


we are still working on 6 goals that can integrate all 17 sdg compasses

probably x1 = purposes of markets valuing younger half of world as the first sg generation - eg even markets like sports, fashions, music largely co-created by youth are nowhere near sustainability's true purpose as every force for fake media shows - perhaps the enduring lesson of how japan has been bullied into olympics timing will be that the youth who lead each sport take back that sports administration - www.economistsports.net - it will be particularly interesting to see which champions want a second life representing their races sdgs

x2 we would like to see womens workd develop green league tables of nations- there should not be just one table- indeed ai needs to keep questioning- are the richest playing their far share? have we actually got say top 10 crises from arctic circle melting dwn, from fish no longer inhabiting oceans to infrastucures designed so community scaled enterprises thrive- there are obviously energy and chemical sectors whose purpose define whether we will go carbon zero in time; there are other sectors eg agriculture, water distribution, fashions that use natural resources unsustainably, then there are some virtual resources that may themselves use little resources but which miseducate of mis-app massively non-sustainable behaviors; you can see that finding a name for x2 isnt simple but itcan be double-checked- where historically have male macroeconomists devalued work like bringing up children or serving elders because they have done this through love and not monetisation 

x3 every global profession needs to come out with greatest exponential risk it has externalised and been asked to do this by its biggest cliets; for example goodwill represents up to 90% of organisations most advanced in ir1 to ir4 but there are no transparent metrics - even the type of measure -exponential isread of number is not yet transparent

x4 the very poorest communities of different types - or for each other sdg the most disadvantaged communities facing that goals most extreme challenges are where we need data and mediation to be intehrated- otherwise those who need sustainability most wont get it and will be extinguished first; somehow those most deeply embedded in communities - the mother theresas or the st francis need to be twinned with tech wizards - this hasnt happened the way venture capital in silicon valley spun round unicorns instead of including any hunicorns

x5 we need blenind of infrastructure everywhere real and virtual so every community is a great (at least sustainable) place to be born into- one example discussed at davos agenda jan 021 and promised by both unicek and un @aiforgood geneva; gps tech can help us map where every school is; we can map schools from zeo to 100% digital access; by making sure this data is on everyone screnpage or is valued as a mpbile app; we can make sure eey year narrows the digital divide- in parallel every teacher needs to be trained in imagining what each grade can leap forward in doing once linkedin; in most nations you hace to pass a test to drive a car; 21st c teaching needs a quiz which enables a community's teacher to behavorally understand whay youth will need most mentoring in adapting to the hi tech hi touch age - see education commission asia for more

x6 what will be most different about 2020s is more and more systems once governed by humans will become autonomus- this aspect of humanising ai sustainably is nt widely discussed - what this means is every community needs to twn with thoses who do understand this - eg staford has some great  practice networks; the association www.futureoflife.org offers a staring point- do your region have a member of life; if so how do your communities mediate with the member?

No comments:

Post a Comment